ASM vs. LLY
ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) and LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) are both stocks. ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while LLY operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, ASM returned 7.19%/yr vs 32.12%/yr for LLY. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ASM vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASM achieves a -13.62% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ASM has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 7.19%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.12% annualized return.
ASM
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- 6M
- -40.33%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 1Y
- 68.16%
- 3Y*
- 95.22%
- 5Y*
- 38.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.53%
LLY
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 56.33%
- 3Y*
- 37.33%
- 5Y*
- 37.67%
- 10Y*
- 32.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.80M | $17.78M | $25.63M | |
| $2.62B | $2.84B | $3.35B |
ASM vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -13.62% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 7.26% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASM and LLY is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
ASM:
$907.17M
LLY:
$1.08T
ASM:
$0.22
LLY:
$28.16
ASM:
23.85
LLY:
40.80
ASM:
0.07
LLY:
0.82
ASM:
7.95
LLY:
14.27
ASM:
3.35
LLY:
32.99
ASM:
$110.70M
LLY:
$72.25B
ASM:
$59.09M
LLY:
$59.75B
ASM:
$55.20M
LLY:
$32.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASM vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
ASM
LLY
ASM vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.44 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 6.60 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASM vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASM drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.10% | -68.24% | -25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.81% | -23.18% | -29.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.81% | -34.48% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.20% | -34.48% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.00% | -34.48% | -55.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.27% | -7.02% | -45.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.65% | -19.17% | -44.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.32% | 8.56% | +20.76% |
Volatility
ASM vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a higher volatility of 22.56% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 8.88%. This indicates that ASM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASM | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.56% | 8.88% | +13.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.44% | 27.69% | +35.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.98% | 38.37% | +44.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.60% | 32.64% | +33.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.91% | 30.37% | +39.54% |
Dividends
ASM vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison
ASM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than LLY's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.94% | 2.46% | 2.77% | 2.37% |
Financials
ASM vs. LLY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASM vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
LLY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
LLY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
LLY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASM and LLY have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (22.56%) compared to LLY (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASM dropped -94.10% vs LLY's -68.24%.
LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASM and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer