ASLV vs. DLN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASLV (Allspring Special Large Value ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. ASLV is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. Over the past year, ASLV returned 15.62% vs 21.42% for DLN. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASLV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.

Performance

ASLV vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASLV achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 9.95% return.

ASLV

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 5.50%
• 6M: 4.94%
• 1Y: 15.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DLN

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 9.95%
• 6M: 9.49%
• 1Y: 21.42%
• 3Y*: 18.12%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: 12.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASLV vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASLV Allspring Special Large Value ETF	5.50%	14.02%
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	9.95%	12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ASLV and DLN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.89

The correlation between ASLV and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASLV vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASLV

ASLV Risk / Return Rank: 39
ASLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ASLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
ASLV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
ASLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ASLV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

DLN

DLN Risk / Return Rank: 78
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASLV vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASLV	DLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.39	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.40	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.43	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	3.53	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.31	14.80	-8.49

ASLV vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASLV and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASLV vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASLV drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASLV and DLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASLV	DLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.98%	-57.84%	+46.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.69%	-6.10%	-2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-1.12%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-7.50%	+5.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	1.45%	+1.03%

Volatility

ASLV vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.78%. This indicates that ASLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASLV	DLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	2.78%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	7.00%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	9.03%	+3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	13.27%	+1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.24%	16.14%	-0.90%

ASLV vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASLV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASLV vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

ASLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASLV Allspring Special Large Value ETF	0.83%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DLN WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund	1.79%	1.90%	2.00%	2.43%	2.53%	2.01%	2.66%	2.51%	2.90%	2.33%	2.64%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASLV and DLN in my portfolio?

ASLV and DLN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASLV or DLN?

ASLV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to DLN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASLV dropped -10.98% vs DLN's -57.84%.

Which ETF is better, ASLV or DLN?

On 1-year performance, DLN leads with 21.42% vs 15.62% for ASLV. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASLV or DLN?

Over the 1-year period, DLN has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASLV or DLN?

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ASLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASLV or DLN?

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.83% for ASLV.

What is the main difference between ASLV and DLN?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ASLV and 0.28% for DLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.