PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASLV vs. AFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASLV vs. AFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASLV achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than AFIX's 0.31% return.


ASLV

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.27%
YTD
4.75%
6M
4.40%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASLV vs. AFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASLV and AFIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASLV vs. AFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASLV
ASLV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ASLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ASLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASLV vs. AFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) and Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASLVAFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.83

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

5.67

+1.16

ASLV vs. AFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the AFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASLV and AFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASLVAFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.43

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.89

+0.18

Drawdowns

ASLV vs. AFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASLV drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, which is greater than AFIX's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASLV and AFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASLVAFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-3.33%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-3.10%

-5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-1.88%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-0.96%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.00%

+1.46%

Volatility

ASLV vs. AFIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Special Large Value ETF (ASLV) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) at 1.42%. This indicates that ASLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASLVAFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

1.42%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

2.87%

+6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

3.97%

+7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

4.55%

+10.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.26%

4.55%

+10.71%

ASLV vs. AFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASLV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AFIX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASLV vs. AFIX - Dividend Comparison

ASLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than AFIX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.02%4.94%0.38%
ASLV
Allspring Special Large Value ETF
0.83%0.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASLV and AFIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASLV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to AFIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASLV dropped -10.98% vs AFIX's -3.33%.

On 1-year performance, ASLV leads with 16.78% vs 5.65% for AFIX. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AFIX has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASLV has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ASLV.

AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.83% for ASLV.

ASLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AFIX is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ASLV and 0.20% for AFIX.

AFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASLV and AFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer