ASILX vs. AWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASILX (AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio) and AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - ASILX is a Long-Short fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, ASILX returned 9.13%/yr vs 5.81%/yr for AWF. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASILX charges 1.55%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AWF.

Performance

ASILX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio (ASILX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASILX achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ASILX has outperformed AWF with an annualized return of 9.13%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.

ASILX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 6M: 5.16%
• 1Y: 13.62%
• 3Y*: 13.36%
• 5Y*: 8.00%
• 10Y*: 9.13%

AWF

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 5.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASILX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASILX AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio	4.97%	9.77%	18.46%	11.06%	-9.94%	17.81%	10.23%	17.17%	-1.61%	12.61%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.70%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ASILX and AWF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2012	0.39

Return for Risk

ASILX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASILX

ASILX Risk / Return Rank: 80
ASILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ASILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ASILX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ASILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ASILX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 3
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASILX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio (ASILX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASILX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	0.16	+2.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	0.29	+3.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.04	+0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	0.14	+3.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.35	0.33	+15.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASILX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASILX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASILX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	0.16	+2.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	0.35	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99	0.38	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.31	+0.66

Drawdowns

ASILX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASILX drawdown since its inception was -18.36%, smaller than the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASILX and AWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASILX	AWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.36%	-55.54%	+37.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.61%	-10.19%	+6.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.94%	-11.12%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.30%	-25.25%	+12.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.36%	-40.12%	+21.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.81%	+5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-12.31%	+9.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	4.26%	-3.35%

Volatility

ASILX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio (ASILX) is 1.27%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that ASILX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASILX	AWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	3.53%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.49%	7.25%	-3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.31%	8.70%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.96%	12.11%	-4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.29%	15.22%	-5.93%

ASILX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASILX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASILX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

ASILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.53%, more than AWF's 7.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASILX AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio	12.53%	13.15%	7.18%	1.41%	6.51%	11.92%	4.28%	3.54%	8.71%	5.03%	0.00%	3.35%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	7.68%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASILX and AWF in my portfolio?

ASILX and AWF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASILX or AWF?

AWF has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to ASILX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASILX dropped -18.36% vs AWF's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.