ASIC vs. MAMA
ASIC (Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC) and MAMA (Mama's Creations Inc.) are both stocks. ASIC operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while MAMA operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past year, ASIC returned -12.21% vs 88.02% for MAMA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASIC vs. MAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIC achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than MAMA's 10.53% return.
ASIC
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- -12.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAMA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 88.02%
- 3Y*
- 75.68%
- 5Y*
- 38.65%
- 10Y*
- 35.78%
ASIC vs. MAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ASIC Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC | -1.14% | -11.16% |
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 10.53% | 65.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIC and MAMA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
ASIC:
$1.03B
MAMA:
$645.92M
ASIC:
$1.95
MAMA:
$0.15
ASIC:
10.66
MAMA:
101.52
ASIC:
0.05
MAMA:
3.00
ASIC:
2.06
MAMA:
3.28
ASIC:
1.64
MAMA:
11.67
ASIC:
$470.18M
MAMA:
$189.23M
ASIC:
$257.61M
MAMA:
$46.29M
ASIC:
$120.37M
MAMA:
$11.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASIC vs. MAMA — Risk / Return Rank
ASIC
MAMA
ASIC vs. MAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) and Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASIC | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.33 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 3.65 | -4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 9.06 | -9.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASIC vs. MAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIC drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum MAMA drawdown of -89.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIC and MAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIC | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.63% | -89.83% | +56.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.77% | -24.05% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -64.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.84% | -14.21% | -1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -45.79% | +26.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.98% | 9.67% | +8.31% |
Volatility
ASIC vs. MAMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) is 9.65%, while Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) has a volatility of 19.32%. This indicates that ASIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASIC | MAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 19.32% | -9.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.68% | 33.09% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.68% | 52.50% | -4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 57.99% | -10.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.79% | 81.61% | -33.82% |
Dividends
ASIC vs. MAMA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASIC nor MAMA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ASIC vs. MAMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC and Mama's Creations Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASIC vs. MAMA - Profitability Comparison
ASIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a gross profit of 67.08M and revenue of 128.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
MAMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
ASIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported an operating income of 34.23M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.
MAMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
ASIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.
MAMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIC and MAMA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAMA has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to ASIC (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIC dropped -33.63% vs MAMA's -89.83%.
MAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASIC and MAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer