ASIA vs. SCVAX

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

ASIA (Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF) and SCVAX (Allspring Small Company Value Fund) are both funds - ASIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while SCVAX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past year, ASIA returned 51.76% vs 24.02% for SCVAX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASIA charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for SCVAX.

Performance

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly higher than SCVAX's 15.06% return.

ASIA

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 25.54%
• 6M: 29.02%
• 1Y: 51.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCVAX

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 15.06%
• 6M: 15.39%
• 1Y: 24.02%
• 3Y*: 13.16%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	25.54%	32.06%	3.41%	0.01%
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund	15.06%	1.75%	8.22%	14.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA and SCVAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.46

The correlation between ASIA and SCVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASIA vs. SCVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIA

ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 78
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SCVAX

SCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 45
SCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASIA	SCVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.53	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.28	+0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.27	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	3.17	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	9.75	+3.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the SCVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA and SCVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASIA	SCVAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	1.53	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	0.45	+0.61

Drawdowns

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum SCVAX drawdown of -70.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and SCVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASIA	SCVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-70.30%	+46.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-8.21%	-6.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.83%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.20%	-2.01%	-5.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-10.60%	+5.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	2.66%	+1.32%

Volatility

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to Allspring Small Company Value Fund (SCVAX) at 4.55%. This indicates that ASIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASIA	SCVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.32%	4.55%	+7.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.43%	11.65%	+8.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.04%	17.01%	+6.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	20.72%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	23.23%	-2.47%

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SCVAX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASIA vs. SCVAX - Dividend Comparison

ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than SCVAX's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	0.83%	1.05%	0.58%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCVAX Allspring Small Company Value Fund	5.11%	5.88%	8.23%	0.77%	4.33%	6.02%	0.39%	0.48%	0.71%	0.30%	0.04%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASIA and SCVAX in my portfolio?

ASIA and SCVAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASIA or SCVAX?

ASIA has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to SCVAX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIA dropped -23.95% vs SCVAX's -70.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.