PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIA vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASIA vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 74.82% return.


ASIA

1D
0.03%
1M
-4.68%
6M
10.28%
YTD
18.51%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.31%

KORU

1D
5.87%
1M
-41.38%
6M
-5.76%
YTD
74.82%
1Y
326.36%
3Y*
52.12%
5Y*
-3.49%
10Y*
2.54%
ALL TIME*
-0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$106.79K$177.13K$195.99K
$701.92M$755.38M$782.78M

ASIA vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
18.51%32.06%3.41%0.01%
KORU
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares
74.82%432.73%-62.18%26.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA and KORU is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.75

The correlation between ASIA and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASIA vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASIA
KORU

Technology

62.1%
61.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
8.8%

Industrials

7.1%
15.4%

Communication Services

4.6%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
4.7%

Energy

2.4%
1.0%

Healthcare

2.3%
3.1%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.2%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Technology

ASIA
62.1%
KORU
61.3%

Financial Services

ASIA
15.4%
KORU
8.8%

Industrials

ASIA
7.1%
KORU
15.4%

Communication Services

ASIA
4.6%
KORU
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ASIA
3.4%
KORU
4.7%

Energy

ASIA
2.4%
KORU
1.0%

Healthcare

ASIA
2.3%
KORU
3.1%

Real Estate

ASIA
1.6%
KORU

-

Consumer Defensive

ASIA
1.1%
KORU
1.7%

Basic Materials

ASIA
1.0%
KORU
1.2%

Utilities

ASIA

-

KORU
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIA vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASIA
ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASIA vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASIAKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

4.06

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

11.13

-4.58

ASIA vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASIA vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASIAKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-95.79%

+71.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.52%

-80.90%

+62.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.51%

-74.91%

+60.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-57.45%

+52.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

29.49%

-23.68%

Volatility

ASIA vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) is 9.95%, while Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 65.03%. This indicates that ASIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASIAKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

65.03%

-55.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.02%

154.04%

-129.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.46%

159.66%

-132.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

96.62%

-74.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

85.86%

-63.62%

ASIA vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASIA vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than KORU's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
0.88%1.05%0.58%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KORU
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.50%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASIA and KORU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (65.03%) compared to ASIA (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIA dropped -23.95% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 1-year performance, KORU leads with 326.36% vs 37.96% for ASIA. On fees, ASIA is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ASIA has been the lower-risk option at 9.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KORU has performed better with a 326.36% return vs 37.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASIA is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for KORU.

ASIA has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.50% for KORU.

ASIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while KORU is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ASIA and 1.32% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIA and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer