ASIA vs. INDY
ASIA (Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF) and INDY (iShares India 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while INDY is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Nifty 50 Index. ASIA is actively managed, while INDY is passively managed. Over the past year, ASIA returned 58.06% vs -12.06% for INDY. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASIA charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INDY.
Performance
ASIA vs. INDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 29.48% return, which is significantly higher than INDY's -12.36% return.
ASIA
- 1D
- -6.60%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 29.48%
- 6M
- 31.09%
- 1Y
- 58.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INDY
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- -12.36%
- 6M
- -12.66%
- 1Y
- -12.06%
- 3Y*
- 2.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.94%
ASIA vs. INDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF | 29.48% | 32.06% | 3.41% | 0.01% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | -12.36% | 4.97% | 3.47% | 8.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIA and INDY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.46 |
ASIA vs. INDY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASIA
INDY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Technology
ASIA
INDY
Financial Services
ASIA
INDY
Industrials
ASIA
INDY
Consumer Cyclical
ASIA
INDY
Communication Services
ASIA
INDY
Energy
ASIA
INDY
Healthcare
ASIA
INDY
Real Estate
ASIA
INDY
-
Basic Materials
ASIA
INDY
Consumer Defensive
ASIA
INDY
Utilities
ASIA
-
INDY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASIA vs. INDY — Risk / Return Rank
ASIA
INDY
ASIA vs. INDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and iShares India 50 ETF (INDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASIA | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.87 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | -0.64 | +4.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | -1.35 | +15.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASIA vs. INDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum INDY drawdown of -44.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and INDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIA | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -44.74% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.47% | -18.95% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.60% | -18.17% | +11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.84% | -12.24% | +7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 8.98% | -4.90% |
Volatility
ASIA vs. INDY - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a higher volatility of 15.17% compared to iShares India 50 ETF (INDY) at 4.06%. This indicates that ASIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASIA | INDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.17% | 4.06% | +11.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.95% | 12.55% | +10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.30% | 14.36% | +10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 14.98% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 19.53% | +2.10% |
ASIA vs. INDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than INDY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASIA vs. INDY - Dividend Comparison
ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than INDY's 9.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF | 0.81% | 1.05% | 0.58% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INDY iShares India 50 ETF | 9.50% | 8.11% | 0.24% | 0.38% | 3.75% | 7.12% | 0.08% | 0.58% | 0.55% | 0.27% | 0.48% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIA and INDY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASIA has higher volatility (15.17%) compared to INDY (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIA dropped -23.95% vs INDY's -44.74%.
On 1-year performance, ASIA leads with 58.06% vs -12.06% for INDY. On fees, INDY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, INDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ASIA has performed better with a 58.06% return vs -12.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ASIA.
INDY has the higher dividend yield at 9.50%, compared with 0.81% for ASIA.
ASIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INDY is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ASIA and 0.65% for INDY.
ASIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASIA and INDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer