ASHX vs. SNPE
ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and SNPE (Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASHX is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while SNPE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for SNPE.
Performance
ASHX vs. SNPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNPE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHX vs. SNPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 8.50% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 10.42% | 18.56% | 23.85% | 27.79% | -17.67% | 31.43% | 19.84% | 12.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHX and SNPE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.33 |
The correlation between ASHX and SNPE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ASHX vs. SNPE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASHX
SNPE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
ASHX
SNPE
Industrials
ASHX
SNPE
Consumer Defensive
ASHX
SNPE
Technology
ASHX
SNPE
Basic Materials
ASHX
SNPE
Healthcare
ASHX
SNPE
Consumer Cyclical
ASHX
SNPE
Utilities
ASHX
SNPE
Energy
ASHX
SNPE
Communication Services
ASHX
SNPE
Real Estate
ASHX
SNPE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHX vs. SNPE — Risk / Return Rank
ASHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SNPE
ASHX vs. SNPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF (SNPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASHX | SNPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASHX vs. SNPE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHX | SNPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -33.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.86% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.93% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility
ASHX vs. SNPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHX | SNPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.62% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.20% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.67% | — |
ASHX vs. SNPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHX vs. SNPE - Dividend Comparison
ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SNPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
SNPE Xtrackers S&P 500 ESG ETF | 0.95% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.65% | 1.08% | 1.42% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHX and SNPE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SNPE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNPE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASHX.
SNPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for ASHX.
ASHX is categorized as China Equities, while SNPE is S&P 500. ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while SNPE tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.10% for SNPE.
Find the right allocation for ASHX and SNPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer