PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASGI vs. TRIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASGI vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASGI achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 37.03% return.


ASGI

1D
1.14%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
9.15%
6M
7.32%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*

TRIN

1D
4.05%
1M
12.80%
YTD
37.03%
6M
37.44%
1Y
55.25%
3Y*
29.05%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASGI vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
9.15%44.20%10.26%14.48%-10.50%12.89%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
37.03%16.01%14.83%53.97%-26.60%36.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ASGI and TRIN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.24

The correlation between ASGI and TRIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASGI vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASGI
ASGI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ASGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASGI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ASGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASGI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIN
TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASGI vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASGITRINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.70

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

9.32

-3.42

ASGI vs. TRIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASGI and TRIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASGI vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASGI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum TRIN drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGI and TRIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASGITRINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.71%

-43.12%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.15%

-14.99%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.24%

-15.58%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.49%

-43.12%

+20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

0.00%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-8.84%

+2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

5.94%

-1.14%

Volatility

ASGI vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) is 7.53%, while Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that ASGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASGITRINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

8.33%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.09%

16.90%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.26%

21.27%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

26.81%

-10.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

27.03%

-9.51%

Dividends

ASGI vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

ASGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.33%, less than TRIN's 19.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
11.33%10.96%12.84%8.03%8.25%6.33%1.76%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
19.93%13.92%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASGI and TRIN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRIN has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to ASGI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASGI dropped -23.71% vs TRIN's -43.12%.

TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASGI and TRIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer