PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASGI vs. FLIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASGI achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly lower than FLIAX's 17.06% return.


ASGI

1D
0.34%
1M
3.69%
6M
10.38%
YTD
14.30%
1Y
26.22%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
13.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.12%

FLIAX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.26%
6M
13.04%
YTD
17.06%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.02M$5.06M$4.09M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
14.30%44.20%10.26%14.48%-10.50%9.16%
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
17.06%-0.20%12.21%0.59%-5.85%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ASGI and FLIAX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2021

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between ASGI and FLIAX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASGI vs. FLIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASGI
ASGI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ASGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASGI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASGI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FLIAX
FLIAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FLIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) and First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASGIFLIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

0.77

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

2.52

+2.81

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASGI Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the FLIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASGI and FLIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASGI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FLIAX drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGI and FLIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASGIFLIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.71%

-23.23%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.15%

-12.50%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-12.50%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.49%

-23.23%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-3.19%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-6.31%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

3.60%

+1.31%

Volatility

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund (ASGI) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund (FLIAX) at 4.19%. This indicates that ASGI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASGIFLIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

4.19%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.98%

10.32%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.70%

15.99%

+3.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.14%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

15.78%

+1.77%

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASGI has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASGI vs. FLIAX - Dividend Comparison

ASGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, while FLIAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ASGI
Abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
10.96%10.96%12.84%8.03%8.25%6.33%1.76%
FLIAX
First Sentier American Listed Infrastructure Fund
0.00%0.00%6.21%2.90%19.90%5.77%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASGI and FLIAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASGI has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to FLIAX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASGI dropped -23.71% vs FLIAX's -23.23%.

ASGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASGI and FLIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer