ASFYX vs. BIL
ASFYX (AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y) and BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both funds - ASFYX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by BlackRock, while BIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, ASFYX returned 2.51%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. ASFYX charges 1.47%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BIL.
Performance
ASFYX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASFYX achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ASFYX has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 2.51%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.
ASFYX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- -2.86%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
BIL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
ASFYX vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y | 11.11% | -9.67% | -3.22% | -10.33% | 35.67% | 3.52% | 13.59% | 8.99% | -12.59% | 6.78% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.60% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.10% | 0.40% | 2.03% | 1.74% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASFYX and BIL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2010 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASFYX vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
ASFYX
BIL
ASFYX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASFYX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -172.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 88.41 | -87.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 357.44 | -353.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 2,834.34 | -2,820.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASFYX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASFYX drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASFYX and BIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASFYX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.43% | -0.78% | -35.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.32% | -0.01% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.32% | -0.01% | -30.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.43% | -0.09% | -36.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.43% | -0.21% | -36.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.16% | 0.00% | -21.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.19% | -0.26% | -12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 0.00% | +1.59% |
Volatility
ASFYX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that ASFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASFYX | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 0.06% | +3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 0.14% | +9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 0.20% | +11.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.80% | 0.26% | +13.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 0.26% | +12.47% |
ASFYX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASFYX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASFYX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
ASFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASFYX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 0.99% | 32.48% | 6.07% | 3.40% | 5.51% | 1.30% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 5.06% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.86% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASFYX and BIL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASFYX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASFYX dropped -36.43% vs BIL's -0.78%.
BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.63 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASFYX and BIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer