PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASFYX vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASFYX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASFYX achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ASFYX has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 2.51%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.


ASFYX

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
11.11%
6M
13.11%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
-2.86%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
2.51%

BIL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.89%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASFYX vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
11.11%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.60%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ASFYX and BIL is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2010

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASFYX vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASFYX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASFYXBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-172.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

88.41

-87.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

357.44

-353.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

2,834.34

-2,820.80

ASFYX vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASFYX and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASFYX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASFYX drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASFYX and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASFYXBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-0.78%

-35.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-0.01%

-5.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.32%

-0.01%

-30.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.43%

-0.09%

-36.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

-0.21%

-36.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.16%

0.00%

-21.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

-0.26%

-12.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

0.00%

+1.59%

Volatility

ASFYX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that ASFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASFYXBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

0.06%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

0.14%

+9.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

0.20%

+11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.80%

0.26%

+13.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

0.26%

+12.47%

ASFYX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASFYX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASFYX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

ASFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.37%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASFYX and BIL have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASFYX dropped -36.43% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.63 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASFYX and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer