ASET vs. TUGN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) and TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. ASET is passively managed, while TUGN is actively managed. ASET charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TUGN.

Performance

ASET vs. TUGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TUGN

• 1D: -1.93%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 15.79%
• 6M: 14.77%
• 1Y: 31.29%
• 3Y*: 20.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. TUGN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	19.99%

Return for Risk

ASET vs. TUGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TUGN

TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 55
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. TUGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASET	TUGN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.87	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.48	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.43	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.24	—

Drawdowns

ASET vs. TUGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TUGN drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and TUGN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASET	TUGN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-23.45%	+23.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.96%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.27%	+3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-6.38%	+6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASET	TUGN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	16.81%	-16.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	17.32%	-17.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	17.32%	-17.32%

ASET vs. TUGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than TUGN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASET vs. TUGN - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	10.82%	11.50%	11.84%	10.83%	7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASET or TUGN?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASET or TUGN?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TUGN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASET or TUGN?

TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between ASET and TUGN?

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and STF. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.65% for TUGN.