PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASET vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASET vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTAP

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
22.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


ASET vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASET
CTAP

Real Estate

41.6%

-

Industrials

16.3%

-

Utilities

12.8%

-

Communication Services

12.1%

-

Energy

7.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.8%

-

Healthcare

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.1%

-

Technology

0.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Financial Services

-

49.3%

Real Estate

ASET
41.6%
CTAP

-

Industrials

ASET
16.3%
CTAP

-

Utilities

ASET
12.8%
CTAP

-

Communication Services

ASET
12.1%
CTAP

-

Energy

ASET
7.8%
CTAP

-

Basic Materials

ASET
5.8%
CTAP

-

Healthcare

ASET
2.2%
CTAP

-

Consumer Defensive

ASET
1.1%
CTAP

-

Technology

ASET
0.2%
CTAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

ASET
0.1%
CTAP

-

Financial Services

ASET

-

CTAP
49.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASET vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASET vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASETCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.56

Drawdowns

ASET vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASETCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.02%

+9.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.16%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-2.16%

+2.16%

Volatility

ASET vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASETCTAPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

24.03%

-24.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

24.03%

-24.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

24.03%

-24.03%

ASET vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASET vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

CTAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASET and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer