ASDIX vs. FHCOX
ASDIX (AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund) and FHCOX (Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, ASDIX returned 2.86%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for FHCOX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASDIX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FHCOX.
Performance
ASDIX vs. FHCOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASDIX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than FHCOX's 1.54% return.
ASDIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.75%
FHCOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ASDIX vs. FHCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASDIX AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund | 0.96% | 4.61% | 4.82% | 5.49% | -1.33% | 0.19% |
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 1.54% | 4.94% | 5.34% | 4.80% | 0.76% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASDIX and FHCOX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASDIX vs. FHCOX — Risk / Return Rank
ASDIX
FHCOX
ASDIX vs. FHCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund (ASDIX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASDIX | FHCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.05 | 4.67 | -2.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.24 | 14.99 | -7.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.88 | 78.37 | -44.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASDIX | FHCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75 | 3.37 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.25 | 2.41 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 2.36 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
ASDIX vs. FHCOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASDIX drawdown since its inception was -7.62%, which is greater than FHCOX's maximum drawdown of -0.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASDIX and FHCOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASDIX | FHCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -0.59% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.59% | -0.30% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.89% | -0.50% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.73% | -0.59% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -0.10% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | 0.06% | +0.07% |
Volatility
ASDIX vs. FHCOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund (ASDIX) is 0.35%, while Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) has a volatility of 0.40%. This indicates that ASDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASDIX | FHCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.40% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.76% | 0.91% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14% | 1.33% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 1.44% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.42% | 1.40% | +0.02% |
ASDIX vs. FHCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASDIX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FHCOX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASDIX vs. FHCOX - Dividend Comparison
ASDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than FHCOX's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASDIX AAM/HIMCO Short Duration Fund | 3.99% | 3.11% | 3.69% | 3.48% | 2.01% | 0.99% | 1.70% | 2.80% | 2.50% | 2.06% | 2.40% | 2.05% |
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 4.38% | 4.61% | 4.99% | 4.17% | 1.26% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASDIX and FHCOX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHCOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to ASDIX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASDIX dropped -7.62% vs FHCOX's -0.59%.
ASDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASDIX and FHCOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer