PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCE vs. RUSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASCE vs. RUSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than RUSC's 18.04% return.


ASCE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.25%
6M
21.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RUSC

1D
-0.75%
1M
2.94%
YTD
18.04%
6M
17.30%
1Y
38.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCE vs. RUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
22.25%8.61%
RUSC
U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF
18.04%10.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and RUSC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASCE vs. RUSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCE

RUSC
RUSC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCE vs. RUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF (RUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASCE vs. RUSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASCERUSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

2.03

-0.11

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. RUSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, roughly equal to the maximum RUSC drawdown of -9.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and RUSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCERUSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-9.18%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.27%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-1.75%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

Volatility

ASCE vs. RUSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCERUSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

18.14%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

18.09%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

18.09%

+1.16%

ASCE vs. RUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RUSC's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASCE vs. RUSC - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than RUSC's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
0.18%0.22%
RUSC
U.S. Small Cap Equity Active ETF
0.32%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ASCE and RUSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for RUSC.

RUSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.64% for RUSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASCE and RUSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer