PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCE vs. RB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASCE vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.76% return.


ASCE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.25%
6M
21.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RB

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCE vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and RB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASCE vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASCE vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASCERBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

3.15

-1.23

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and RB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCERBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-1.70%

-7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.47%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-0.41%

-1.69%

Volatility

ASCE vs. RB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCERBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

6.21%

+13.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

6.21%

+13.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

6.21%

+13.04%

ASCE vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASCE vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASCE and RB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

ASCE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.58% for RB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASCE and RB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer