PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASBAX vs. DBLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASBAX achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ASBAX has underperformed DBLSX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while DBLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.87% annualized return.


ASBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.60%
10Y*
1.61%

DBLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
2.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
0.35%5.05%4.31%3.60%-4.16%-0.88%3.53%2.81%1.10%0.91%
DBLSX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund
1.06%5.74%5.32%6.76%-2.69%0.70%2.02%4.73%1.40%2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ASBAX and DBLSX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2011

0.50

The correlation between ASBAX and DBLSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASBAX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASBAX
ASBAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ASBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ASBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLSX
DBLSX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DBLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASBAXDBLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

2.06

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

6.27

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

28.69

-19.29

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the DBLSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASBAX and DBLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASBAXDBLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.76

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

2.28

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.04

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.05

+0.92

Drawdowns

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASBAX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASBAX and DBLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASBAXDBLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-57.22%

+50.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-0.72%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-0.72%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.23%

-4.71%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.29%

-57.22%

+50.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-45.00%

+44.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-31.51%

+30.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.16%

+0.18%

Volatility

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.42%. This indicates that ASBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASBAXDBLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.42%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

0.89%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.20%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

1.39%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.83%

63.99%

-62.16%

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASBAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASBAX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison

ASBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than DBLSX's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
3.76%3.87%3.99%2.88%1.02%0.42%2.08%1.66%1.70%1.21%0.83%1.21%
DBLSX
DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund
4.55%4.64%5.09%4.49%2.50%1.72%2.37%3.21%2.92%2.42%2.52%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASBAX and DBLSX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASBAX has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to DBLSX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASBAX dropped -6.29% vs DBLSX's -57.22%.

DBLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASBAX and DBLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer