PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASBAX vs. BFCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASBAX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than BFCAX's -1.33% return.


ASBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-0.06%
YTD
0.24%
1Y
2.47%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
1.57%
ALL TIME*
1.63%

BFCAX

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.81%
6M
-1.57%
YTD
-1.33%
1Y
0.69%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
-1.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
0.24%5.05%4.31%3.60%-4.16%-0.88%3.53%2.81%1.10%0.91%
BFCAX
American Funds Corporate Bond Fund
-1.33%6.67%1.71%6.85%-16.51%-2.15%13.05%13.21%-2.50%5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ASBAX and BFCAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.58

The correlation between ASBAX and BFCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASBAX vs. BFCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASBAX
ASBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ASBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ASBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BFCAX
BFCAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BFCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BFCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) and American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASBAXBFCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.08

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.62

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

1.52

+5.88

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the BFCAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASBAX and BFCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASBAX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, smaller than the maximum BFCAX drawdown of -23.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASBAX and BFCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASBAXBFCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-23.01%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-3.11%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-5.68%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.03%

-22.55%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-6.54%

+6.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-6.44%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

1.27%

-0.90%

Volatility

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America (ASBAX) is 0.48%, while American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that ASBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASBAXBFCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

1.15%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.47%

3.34%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

4.27%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.26%

6.69%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.84%

5.96%

-4.12%

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASBAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than BFCAX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASBAX vs. BFCAX - Dividend Comparison

ASBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than BFCAX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASBAX
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America
3.42%3.87%3.99%2.88%1.02%0.42%2.08%1.66%1.70%1.21%0.83%1.21%
BFCAX
American Funds Corporate Bond Fund
3.90%4.20%4.06%2.82%1.95%1.50%4.43%3.44%2.63%2.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASBAX and BFCAX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFCAX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to ASBAX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASBAX dropped -6.29% vs BFCAX's -23.01%.

ASBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASBAX and BFCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer