PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARTYX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Developing World Fund (ARTYX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTYX achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than COBYX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ARTYX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.


ARTYX

1D
-0.35%
1M
10.65%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-4.05%
1Y
-6.46%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-1.38%
10Y*
11.09%

COBYX

1D
0.67%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.74%
6M
13.67%
1Y
14.46%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARTYX
Artisan Developing World Fund
-0.66%7.82%28.03%29.51%-41.35%-9.97%81.24%41.67%-15.68%35.10%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
10.74%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ARTYX and COBYX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between ARTYX and COBYX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARTYX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTYX
ARTYX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ARTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Developing World Fund (ARTYX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARTYXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.37

1.23

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.40

1.86

-2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.22

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

1.62

-1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.48

5.15

-5.63

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTYX Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTYX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARTYXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

1.23

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.59

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.35

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.39

+0.09

Drawdowns

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTYX drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTYX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARTYXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.61%

-34.18%

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.14%

-8.95%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.14%

-16.29%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-17.10%

-39.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.61%

-34.18%

-25.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.14%

-1.12%

-19.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-6.80%

-11.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.01%

2.99%

+10.02%

Volatility

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Artisan Developing World Fund (ARTYX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.75%. This indicates that ARTYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARTYXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

3.75%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

9.46%

+4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

11.78%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.23%

13.99%

+13.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.26%

13.64%

+10.62%

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARTYX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARTYX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

ARTYX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ARTYX
Artisan Developing World Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%9.44%4.20%0.00%0.01%3.37%0.51%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.06%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARTYX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARTYX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to COBYX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARTYX dropped -59.61% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

COBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARTYX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer