ARTY vs. CHAT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ARTY (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. ARTY is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARTY returned 25.12%/yr vs 40.54%/yr for CHAT. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ARTY charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

ARTY vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ARTY having a 38.42% return and CHAT slightly higher at 39.01%.

ARTY

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -6.25%
• 6M: 29.47%
• YTD: 38.42%
• 1Y: 57.81%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 9.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.64%

CHAT

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -7.69%
• 6M: 32.64%
• YTD: 39.01%
• 1Y: 68.87%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 45.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	$36.04M	$40.00M	$59.74M
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	$58.63M	$57.19M	$67.40M

ARTY vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	38.42%	29.97%	8.02%	16.87%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	39.01%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ARTY and CHAT is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.88

The correlation between ARTY and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARTY vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARTY	CHAT
Technology	87.8%	78.9%
Industrials	5.3%	3.6%
Communication Services	3.0%	15.2%
Utilities	1.6%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	-
Healthcare	0.9%	-
Financial Services	0.7%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-

Return for Risk

ARTY vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARTY

ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 60
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARTY vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARTY	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.63	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.08	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.27	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	2.25	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	7.96	-0.71

ARTY vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTY and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARTY vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTY drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTY and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARTY	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.50%	-31.34%	-23.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.00%	-28.34%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	-31.34%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.41%	-21.25%	+3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.68%	-5.73%	-13.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.42%	8.01%	-0.59%

Volatility

ARTY vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) is 14.17%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that ARTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARTY	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.17%	16.74%	-2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.16%	34.39%	-1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.34%	39.18%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.29%	32.41%	-2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.64%	32.41%	-3.77%

ARTY vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARTY has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARTY vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

ARTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CHAT's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ARTY iShares Future AI & Tech ETF	0.07%	0.00%	0.50%	0.88%	0.75%	2.41%	0.53%	0.69%	0.34%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.05%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARTY and CHAT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ARTY and CHAT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ARTY or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to ARTY (14.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARTY dropped -54.50% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, ARTY or CHAT?

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 40.54% vs 25.12% for ARTY. On fees, ARTY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ARTY has been the lower-risk option at 14.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARTY or CHAT?

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 40.54% return vs 25.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARTY or CHAT?

ARTY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARTY or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.07% for ARTY.

What is the main difference between ARTY and CHAT?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ARTY and 0.75% for CHAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.