ARTHX vs. HLMGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ARTHX (Artisan Global Equity Fund) and HLMGX (Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ARTHX returned 14.26%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for HLMGX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARTHX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for HLMGX.

Performance

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Global Equity Fund (ARTHX) and Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTHX achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than HLMGX's 1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ARTHX has outperformed HLMGX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while HLMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.

ARTHX

• 1D: -2.40%
• 1M: -5.39%
• YTD: 8.93%
• 6M: 8.69%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 26.42%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

HLMGX

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 7.57%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARTHX Artisan Global Equity Fund	8.93%	45.58%	16.80%	11.89%	-20.62%	4.95%	29.46%	31.13%	-3.75%	31.35%
HLMGX Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio	1.57%	11.95%	13.50%	21.84%	-30.20%	14.38%	29.68%	28.77%	-10.61%	31.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ARTHX and HLMGX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2010	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between ARTHX and HLMGX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ARTHX vs. HLMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTHX

ARTHX Risk / Return Rank: 35
ARTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ARTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ARTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ARTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ARTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

HLMGX

HLMGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
HLMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
HLMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HLMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HLMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HLMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Global Equity Fund (ARTHX) and Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARTHX	HLMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.68	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.02	+1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.13	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	0.82	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.87	3.22	+4.66

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the HLMGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTHX and HLMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTHX drawdown since its inception was -37.42%, smaller than the maximum HLMGX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTHX and HLMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARTHX	HLMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.42%	-54.27%	+16.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-11.28%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.06%	-15.76%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.42%	-38.48%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.42%	-38.48%	+1.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.07%	-4.67%	-3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-12.95%	+5.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	2.86%	+0.10%

Volatility

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Volatility Comparison

Artisan Global Equity Fund (ARTHX) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX) at 5.16%. This indicates that ARTHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARTHX	HLMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	5.16%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.06%	11.10%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.68%	13.56%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	18.36%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	18.08%	-0.43%

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARTHX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than HLMGX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARTHX vs. HLMGX - Dividend Comparison

ARTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.47%, more than HLMGX's 20.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARTHX Artisan Global Equity Fund	21.47%	23.39%	11.32%	0.89%	0.88%	18.02%	11.98%	8.76%	18.13%	0.66%	0.00%	2.17%
HLMGX Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio	20.67%	20.99%	30.72%	0.28%	0.00%	16.22%	5.68%	0.27%	12.74%	13.71%	1.34%	2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARTHX and HLMGX in my portfolio?

ARTHX and HLMGX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARTHX or HLMGX?

ARTHX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to HLMGX (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARTHX dropped -37.42% vs HLMGX's -54.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.