HLMGX vs. HLFMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX).
HLMGX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on Nov 28, 1996. HLFMX is managed by Harding Loevner. It was launched on May 26, 2008.
Performance
HLMGX vs. HLFMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLMGX vs. HLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLMGX Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio | -4.92% | 11.95% | 13.50% | 21.84% | -30.20% | 14.38% | 29.68% | 28.77% | -10.61% | 31.94% |
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | -0.11% | 16.95% | 8.76% | 10.43% | -18.91% | 10.18% | 0.11% | 10.88% | -15.45% | 25.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLMGX achieves a -4.92% return, which is significantly lower than HLFMX's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HLMGX has outperformed HLFMX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while HLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.15% annualized return.
HLMGX
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
HLFMX
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- -5.71%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLMGX vs. HLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLMGX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFMX's 1.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLMGX vs. HLFMX — Risk / Return Rank
HLMGX
HLFMX
HLMGX vs. HLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLMGX | HLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 1.36 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 1.85 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.41 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 5.03 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLMGX | HLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 1.36 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.48 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.35 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.07 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLMGX and HLFMX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HLMGX vs. HLFMX - Dividend Comparison
HLMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.08%, more than HLFMX's 3.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLMGX Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio | 22.08% | 20.99% | 30.72% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 16.22% | 5.68% | 0.27% | 12.74% | 13.71% | 1.34% | 2.81% |
HLFMX Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund | 3.57% | 3.56% | 1.88% | 1.77% | 2.28% | 0.83% | 1.61% | 1.97% | 1.34% | 1.90% | 1.01% | 1.13% |
Drawdowns
HLMGX vs. HLFMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLMGX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, smaller than the maximum HLFMX drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLMGX and HLFMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLMGX | HLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.27% | -63.95% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -11.09% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.48% | -28.37% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.48% | -46.61% | +8.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.79% | -9.26% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -19.38% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.11% | -0.29% |
Volatility
HLMGX vs. HLFMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio (HLMGX) is 6.03%, while Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that HLMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLMGX | HLFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 6.73% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 8.72% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 12.03% | +4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 10.23% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 11.79% | +6.30% |