ARSVX vs. MGSEX
ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) and MGSEX (AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund) are both mutual funds - ARSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG, while MGSEX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX returned 9.40%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for MGSEX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARSVX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for MGSEX.
Performance
ARSVX vs. MGSEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARSVX achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than MGSEX's 55.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ARSVX has underperformed MGSEX with an annualized return of 9.40%, while MGSEX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.64% annualized return.
ARSVX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- -2.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
MGSEX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 55.31%
- 6M
- 57.70%
- 1Y
- 92.20%
- 3Y*
- 32.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
ARSVX vs. MGSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 3.07% | -7.36% | 14.05% | 14.86% | -6.49% | 21.14% | 1.84% | 38.29% | -6.96% | 11.73% |
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 55.31% | 41.56% | 7.23% | -4.82% | -27.91% | 0.83% | 38.74% | 80.58% | -3.77% | 20.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARSVX and MGSEX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARSVX and MGSEX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARSVX vs. MGSEX — Risk / Return Rank
ARSVX
MGSEX
ARSVX vs. MGSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) and AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARSVX | MGSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.60 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 6.54 | -6.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 20.76 | -20.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARSVX vs. MGSEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARSVX drawdown since its inception was -54.85%, smaller than the maximum MGSEX drawdown of -62.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARSVX and MGSEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARSVX | MGSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.85% | -62.06% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.62% | -14.34% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | -19.30% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.21% | -43.13% | +23.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.52% | -45.32% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.28% | 0.00% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -13.86% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 4.50% | +3.88% |
Volatility
ARSVX vs. MGSEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) is 3.22%, while AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a volatility of 15.81%. This indicates that ARSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARSVX | MGSEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 15.81% | -12.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 24.20% | -10.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 27.69% | -10.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 20.82% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 26.32% | -6.96% |
ARSVX vs. MGSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARSVX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MGSEX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARSVX vs. MGSEX - Dividend Comparison
ARSVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 4.78% | 3.87% | 7.75% | 0.00% | 12.10% | 13.01% | 14.96% | 4.96% | 6.51% |
MGSEX AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 83.77% | 4.35% | 59.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARSVX and MGSEX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGSEX has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to ARSVX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARSVX dropped -54.85% vs MGSEX's -62.06%.
MGSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARSVX and MGSEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer