PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARRNF vs. TMRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARRNF achieves a 28.10% return, which is significantly lower than TMRC's 43.77% return.


ARRNF

1D
2.32%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
28.10%
6M
9.80%
1Y
49.44%
3Y*
34.73%
5Y*
68.17%
10Y*

TMRC

1D
-1.78%
1M
-15.38%
YTD
43.77%
6M
-3.24%
1Y
37.50%
3Y*
-2.09%
5Y*
-16.97%
10Y*
19.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ARRNF
American Rare Earths Limited
28.10%23.89%41.25%-11.60%4.42%550.00%-20.00%
TMRC
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp
43.77%144.74%-41.84%-67.01%-33.83%11.30%3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between ARRNF and TMRC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2020

0.11

The correlation between ARRNF and TMRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARRNF:

$149.92M

TMRC:

$71.96M

EPS

ARRNF:

-A$0.02

TMRC:

-$0.03

PB Ratio

ARRNF:

4.42

TMRC:

16.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARRNF:

-A$128.85K

TMRC:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARRNF:

-A$385.87K

TMRC:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

ARRNF:

-A$12.72M

TMRC:

-$1.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARRNF vs. TMRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARRNF
ARRNF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ARRNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARRNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARRNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ARRNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARRNF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TMRC
TMRC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TMRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMRC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TMRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMRC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARRNFTMRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.20

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.49

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

0.68

+0.32

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARRNF Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the TMRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARRNF and TMRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARRNF drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, smaller than the maximum TMRC drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARRNF and TMRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARRNFTMRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.01%

-95.42%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.13%

-77.33%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.13%

-83.33%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.01%

-91.57%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.46%

-80.83%

+20.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.27%

-53.95%

+7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.90%

55.57%

-5.67%

Volatility

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Rare Earths Limited (ARRNF) is 26.35%, while Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) has a volatility of 31.26%. This indicates that ARRNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARRNFTMRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.35%

31.26%

-4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.26%

88.45%

-37.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

126.90%

157.98%

-31.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

314.54%

109.30%

+205.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

289.79%

109.54%

+180.25%

Dividends

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARRNF nor TMRC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ARRNF vs. TMRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Rare Earths Limited and Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00K-50.00K0.0050.00K100.00K20212022202320242025202600
(ARRNF) Total Revenue
(TMRC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ARRNF values in AUD, TMRC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ARRNF and TMRC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMRC has higher volatility (31.26%) compared to ARRNF (26.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARRNF dropped -83.01% vs TMRC's -95.42%.

ARRNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARRNF and TMRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer