ARMG vs. GOOW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW).

ARMG and GOOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARMG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jan 14, 2025. GOOW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jul 24, 2025.

Performance

ARMG vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARMG vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	78.95%	-60.51%
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	-6.83%	75.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMG achieves a 78.95% return, which is significantly higher than GOOW's -6.83% return.

ARMG

• 1D: 5.05%
• 1M: 45.92%
• YTD: 78.95%
• 6M: -13.55%
• 1Y: 34.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOOW

• 1D: 4.18%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: -6.83%
• 6M: 23.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMG vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.

GOOW

Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF

ARMG

Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF

Return for Risk

ARMG vs. GOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARMG

ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 29
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMG vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARMG	GOOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.92	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARMG	GOOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	2.96	-3.18

Correlation

The correlation between ARMG and GOOW is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARMG vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison

ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than GOOW's 33.30% yield.

	TTM	2025
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF	2.72%	4.86%
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF	33.30%	19.77%

Drawdowns

ARMG vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMG drawdown since its inception was -80.28%, which is greater than GOOW's maximum drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMG and GOOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARMG	GOOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.28%	-24.88%	-55.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.60%	-16.70%	-40.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.38%	-4.80%	-51.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ARMG	GOOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	45.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	76.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.71%	35.44%	+82.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	123.23%	35.44%	+87.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	123.23%	35.44%	+87.79%