PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARLU vs. SPBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARLU vs. SPBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) and AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARLU achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPBU's 5.93% return.


ARLU

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
4.03%
6M
3.19%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPBU

1D
-1.16%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
5.93%
6M
4.96%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARLU vs. SPBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARLU and SPBU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.97

The correlation between ARLU and SPBU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARLU vs. SPBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SPBU
SPBU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARLU vs. SPBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) and AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARLUSPBUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.46

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.26

10.31

-3.05

ARLU vs. SPBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the SPBU Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARLU and SPBU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARLU vs. SPBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARLU drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than SPBU's maximum drawdown of -8.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARLU and SPBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARLUSPBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-8.61%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-7.10%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-2.77%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-1.32%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.69%

+0.52%

Volatility

ARLU vs. SPBU - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) and AllianzIM Buffer15 Uncapped Allocation ETF (SPBU) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARLUSPBUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

7.72%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

10.05%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

11.88%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

11.88%

+0.78%

ARLU vs. SPBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARLU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SPBU's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARLU vs. SPBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARLU nor SPBU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ARLU and SPBU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPBU has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to ARLU (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARLU dropped -15.38% vs SPBU's -8.61%.

On 1-year performance, SPBU leads with 17.39% vs 16.01% for ARLU. On fees, ARLU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPBU has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 16.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARLU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBU.

ARLU and SPBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ARLU is categorized as Options Trading, while SPBU is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ARLU and 0.79% for SPBU.

SPBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARLU and SPBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer