ARKY vs. BITU
ARKY (ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ARKY is actively managed, while BITU is passively managed. ARKY charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITU.
Performance
ARKY vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITU
- 1D
- -5.61%
- 1M
- -40.78%
- YTD
- -55.56%
- 6M
- -61.06%
- 1Y
- -73.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKY vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKY ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -25.35% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKY vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
ARKY
BITU
ARKY vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF (ARKY) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKY | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.37 | — |
Drawdowns
ARKY vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKY drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -80.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKY and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKY | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -80.13% | +80.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -80.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -80.13% | +80.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -34.58% | +34.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 50.09% | — |
Volatility
ARKY vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKY | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 68.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 87.07% | -87.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 97.43% | -97.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 97.43% | -97.43% |
ARKY vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKY vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
ARKY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARKY ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 88.31% | 50.23% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BITU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ARKY.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 88.31%, compared with 0.00% for ARKY.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ARKY and 0.95% for BITU.
Find the right allocation for ARKY and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer