PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKX vs. TSLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKX vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKX achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -27.58% return.


ARKX

1D
-1.94%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
16.56%
6M
17.78%
1Y
52.99%
3Y*
31.55%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

TSLR

1D
3.62%
1M
-19.09%
YTD
-27.58%
6M
-31.37%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKX vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ARKX
ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF
16.56%48.46%26.67%8.71%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-27.58%-25.97%67.57%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKX and TSLR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.46

ARKX vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ARKX
TSLR

Industrials

55.7%

-

Technology

27.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
66.6%

Communication Services

7.6%

-

Healthcare

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

ARKX
55.7%
TSLR

-

Technology

ARKX
27.4%
TSLR

-

Consumer Cyclical

ARKX
7.8%
TSLR
66.6%

Communication Services

ARKX
7.6%
TSLR

-

Healthcare

ARKX
1.5%
TSLR

-

Basic Materials

ARKX
0.0%
TSLR

-

Consumer Defensive

ARKX

-

TSLR

-

Energy

ARKX

-

TSLR

-

Financial Services

ARKX

-

TSLR

-

Real Estate

ARKX

-

TSLR

-

Utilities

ARKX

-

TSLR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKX vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKX
ARKX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKX vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKXTSLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.11

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

0.36

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

0.73

+6.14

ARKX vs. TSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the TSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKX and TSLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKX vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKX drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKX and TSLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKXTSLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.61%

-82.80%

+39.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.42%

-54.37%

+33.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.49%

-62.94%

+52.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-50.31%

+30.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.74%

26.72%

-18.98%

Volatility

ARKX vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) is 12.77%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a volatility of 28.92%. This indicates that ARKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKXTSLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.77%

28.92%

-16.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.51%

57.66%

-31.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.50%

89.10%

-55.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.02%

115.61%

-87.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

115.61%

-87.96%

ARKX vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKX vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARKX nor TSLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKX and TSLR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLR has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to ARKX (12.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKX dropped -43.61% vs TSLR's -82.80%.

On 1-year performance, ARKX leads with 52.99% vs 19.41% for TSLR. On fees, ARKX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ARKX has been the lower-risk option at 12.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ARKX has performed better with a 52.99% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARKX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

ARKX and TSLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ARKX is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKX and 1.50% for TSLR.

ARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKX and TSLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer