ARKX vs. NASA
ARKX (ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF) and NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ARKX vs. NASA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKX
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- 6M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 8.01%
- 1Y
- 25.35%
- 3Y*
- 27.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- —
NASA
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- -21.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKX vs. NASA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKX ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF | 11.83% |
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKX and NASA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKX vs. NASA — Risk / Return Rank
ARKX
NASA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARKX vs. NASA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF (ARKX) and Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKX | NASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKX vs. NASA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKX drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than NASA's maximum drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKX and NASA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKX | NASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -40.20% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.06% | -40.20% | +23.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.80% | -12.40% | -7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.45% | — | — |
Volatility
ARKX vs. NASA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKX | NASA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.24% | 67.36% | -33.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.32% | 67.36% | -39.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.76% | 67.36% | -39.60% |
ARKX vs. NASA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ARKX and NASA have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ARKX vs. NASA - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKX nor NASA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKX and NASA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARKX and NASA have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
ARKX and NASA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Tema.
Find the right allocation for ARKX and NASA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer