ARKW vs. XTL
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. ARKW is actively managed, while XTL is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKW returned 22.86%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for XTL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
ARKW vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed XTL with an annualized return of 22.86%, while XTL has yielded a comparatively lower 16.10% annualized return.
ARKW
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- -1.16%
- 1Y
- 15.15%
- 3Y*
- 37.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.86%
XTL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 55.42%
- 1Y
- 120.69%
- 3Y*
- 45.66%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
ARKW vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -0.20% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.46% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and XTL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ARKW and XTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKW vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
XTL
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ARKW
XTL
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
XTL
-
Communication Services
ARKW
XTL
Financial Services
ARKW
XTL
-
Industrials
ARKW
XTL
-
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
XTL
-
Energy
ARKW
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
ARKW
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
ARKW
-
XTL
Utilities
ARKW
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
XTL
ARKW vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.58 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 8.26 | -7.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 34.62 | -33.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -37.01% | -43.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -14.70% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -22.79% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -37.01% | -40.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | -37.01% | -43.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.01% | -6.61% | -13.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.97% | -9.76% | -14.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.93% | 3.50% | +14.43% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) have volatilities of 11.21% and 11.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 11.24% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.94% | 24.21% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.21% | 30.10% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.64% | 25.35% | +18.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.77% | 23.67% | +14.10% |
ARKW vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than XTL's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.59% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and XTL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to ARKW (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.86% vs 16.10% for XTL. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 16.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.
ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XTL is Communications Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.35% for XTL.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer