ARKW vs. XMMO
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. ARKW is actively managed, while XMMO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKW returned 22.38%/yr vs 18.83%/yr for XMMO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
ARKW vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 16.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 22.38%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.83% annualized return.
ARKW
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- 6M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- -1.17%
- 3Y*
- 32.28%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 22.38%
XMMO
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- 6M
- 13.31%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
ARKW vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 0.47% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 16.50% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and XMMO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.67 |
The correlation between ARKW and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKW vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
XMMO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ARKW
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
XMMO
Financial Services
ARKW
XMMO
Communication Services
ARKW
XMMO
Industrials
ARKW
XMMO
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
XMMO
Energy
ARKW
-
XMMO
Healthcare
ARKW
-
XMMO
Real Estate
ARKW
-
XMMO
Utilities
ARKW
-
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
XMMO
ARKW vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.21 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 2.76 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 9.60 | -9.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -55.37% | -25.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -8.71% | -27.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -24.93% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -27.91% | -49.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | -36.74% | -43.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.48% | -7.50% | -11.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.95% | -9.42% | -14.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.70% | 2.51% | +16.19% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 6.93%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 6.93% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.43% | 17.50% | +7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.23% | 20.67% | +12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.71% | 21.75% | +21.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 22.35% | +15.43% |
ARKW vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.58% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and XMMO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to XMMO (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.38% vs 18.83% for XMMO. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.38% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
ARKW is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer