ARKW vs. MDYG
ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) and MDYG (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. ARKW is actively managed, while MDYG is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKW returned 22.53%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for MDYG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKW charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MDYG.
Performance
ARKW vs. MDYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKW achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly lower than MDYG's 18.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKW has outperformed MDYG with an annualized return of 22.53%, while MDYG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.88% annualized return.
ARKW
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- -4.76%
- 6M
- -7.39%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- 36.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.21%
- 10Y*
- 22.53%
MDYG
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 6M
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
ARKW vs. MDYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -4.76% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 18.55% | 7.22% | 15.84% | 17.30% | -18.92% | 18.46% | 22.57% | 26.10% | -10.46% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKW and MDYG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.69 |
The correlation between ARKW and MDYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKW vs. MDYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKW
MDYG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ARKW
MDYG
Communication Services
ARKW
MDYG
Consumer Cyclical
ARKW
MDYG
Financial Services
ARKW
MDYG
Industrials
ARKW
MDYG
Basic Materials
ARKW
-
MDYG
Consumer Defensive
ARKW
-
MDYG
Energy
ARKW
-
MDYG
Healthcare
ARKW
-
MDYG
Real Estate
ARKW
-
MDYG
Utilities
ARKW
-
MDYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKW vs. MDYG — Risk / Return Rank
ARKW
MDYG
ARKW vs. MDYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKW | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.29 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.98 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 11.83 | -11.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKW vs. MDYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKW drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than MDYG's maximum drawdown of -58.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKW and MDYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKW | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -58.44% | -22.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.21% | -9.91% | -26.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.21% | -25.45% | -10.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.36% | -29.26% | -48.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.52% | -39.27% | -41.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.67% | -1.57% | -22.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.97% | -8.01% | -15.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.14% | 2.49% | +15.65% |
Volatility
ARKW vs. MDYG - Volatility Comparison
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) at 5.90%. This indicates that ARKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKW | MDYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 5.90% | +5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.74% | 13.90% | +10.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.81% | 17.63% | +15.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.66% | 20.71% | +22.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.78% | 21.08% | +16.70% |
ARKW vs. MDYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKW has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than MDYG's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKW vs. MDYG - Dividend Comparison
ARKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than MDYG's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.67% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
MDYG SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 1.20% | 1.16% | 0.69% | 0.71% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.23% | 1.25% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKW and MDYG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKW has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to MDYG (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKW dropped -80.52% vs MDYG's -58.44%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.53% vs 11.88% for MDYG. On fees, MDYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MDYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.53% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.58% for MDYG.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for ARKW and 0.15% for MDYG.
MDYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKW and MDYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer