ARKQ vs. XLV
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. ARKQ is actively managed, while XLV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ returned 22.08%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for XLV. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
ARKQ vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 22.08%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 14.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
ARKQ vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.83% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and XLV is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARKQ and XLV has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ARKQ vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKQ
XLV
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
ARKQ
XLV
-
Technology
ARKQ
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARKQ
XLV
-
Communication Services
ARKQ
XLV
-
Energy
ARKQ
XLV
-
Healthcare
ARKQ
XLV
Utilities
ARKQ
XLV
-
Basic Materials
ARKQ
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKQ
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
ARKQ
-
XLV
-
Real Estate
ARKQ
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
XLV
ARKQ vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.17 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 1.37 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 3.28 | +5.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -39.17% | -20.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -10.47% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -17.11% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -17.11% | -38.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | -28.40% | -31.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -4.17% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -7.12% | -10.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 4.37% | +2.61% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.96%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 4.96% | +8.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 10.58% | +15.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.76% | 15.05% | +18.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 14.75% | +17.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 16.58% | +13.43% |
ARKQ vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and XLV have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKQ has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to XLV (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 9.89% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 9.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.08% for XLV.
ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer