ARKQ vs. ITA
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. ARKQ is actively managed, while ITA is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ returned 22.08%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for ITA. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITA.
Performance
ARKQ vs. ITA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than ITA's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed ITA with an annualized return of 22.08%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively lower 15.54% annualized return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
ITA
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 32.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.94%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
ARKQ vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 10.73% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and ITA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.58 |
The correlation between ARKQ and ITA shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKQ vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKQ
ITA
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
ARKQ
ITA
Technology
ARKQ
ITA
Consumer Cyclical
ARKQ
ITA
-
Communication Services
ARKQ
ITA
-
Energy
ARKQ
ITA
-
Healthcare
ARKQ
ITA
-
Utilities
ARKQ
ITA
-
Basic Materials
ARKQ
-
ITA
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKQ
-
ITA
-
Financial Services
ARKQ
-
ITA
-
Real Estate
ARKQ
-
ITA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
ITA
ARKQ vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 2.06 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 5.46 | +3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, roughly equal to the maximum ITA drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and ITA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -59.72% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -15.82% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -15.82% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -18.72% | -36.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | -51.00% | -8.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -5.13% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -9.45% | -7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 5.98% | +1.00% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) at 9.14%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 9.14% | +4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 18.45% | +7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.76% | 21.82% | +11.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 20.23% | +12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 23.24% | +6.77% |
ARKQ vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than ITA's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and ITA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKQ has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to ITA (9.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs ITA's -59.72%.
On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 15.54% for ITA. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, ITA has been the lower-risk option at 9.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 15.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.38% for ITA.
ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and ITA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer