ARKQ vs. GOEX
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while GOEX is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. ARKQ is actively managed, while GOEX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ returned 22.08%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for GOEX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.
Performance
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -3.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed GOEX with an annualized return of 22.08%, while GOEX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.58% annualized return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
GOEX
- 1D
- 7.67%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 63.83%
- 3Y*
- 47.73%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -3.57% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and GOEX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ARKQ and GOEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKQ
GOEX
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
ARKQ
GOEX
Technology
ARKQ
GOEX
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARKQ
GOEX
-
Communication Services
ARKQ
GOEX
-
Energy
ARKQ
GOEX
-
Healthcare
ARKQ
GOEX
-
Utilities
ARKQ
GOEX
-
Basic Materials
ARKQ
-
GOEX
Consumer Defensive
ARKQ
-
GOEX
-
Financial Services
ARKQ
-
GOEX
-
Real Estate
ARKQ
-
GOEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
GOEX
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 1.62 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 4.47 | +4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and GOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -88.83% | +28.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -39.64% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -39.64% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -47.16% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | -53.66% | -6.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -28.84% | +22.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -63.51% | +46.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 14.42% | -7.44% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 13.37%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 18.95%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 18.95% | -5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 42.19% | -15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.76% | 51.19% | -17.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 39.51% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 40.16% | -10.15% |
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than GOEX's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.16% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and GOEX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (18.95%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs GOEX's -88.83%.
On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 13.58% for GOEX. On fees, GOEX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GOEX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while GOEX is Gold. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.65% for GOEX.
ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and GOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer