PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKQ vs. FGRTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than FGRTX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed FGRTX with an annualized return of 21.73%, while FGRTX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.46% annualized return.


ARKQ

1D
-0.64%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
12.86%
6M
13.25%
1Y
55.23%
3Y*
32.57%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
21.73%

FGRTX

1D
1.62%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
8.35%
6M
9.78%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
15.83%
10Y*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
12.86%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
8.35%26.92%25.98%26.51%-8.98%26.29%12.96%31.07%-7.44%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and FGRTX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.70

The correlation between ARKQ and FGRTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. FGRTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FGRTX
FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKQFGRTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.00

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

13.36

-5.41

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FGRTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and FGRTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than FGRTX's maximum drawdown of -56.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and FGRTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKQFGRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.89%

-56.17%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.58%

-8.99%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.76%

-18.51%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.71%

-23.35%

-32.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.89%

-35.18%

-24.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

-2.25%

-7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.22%

-8.71%

-8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

2.01%

+4.96%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Volatility Comparison

ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a higher volatility of 12.70% compared to Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) at 4.04%. This indicates that ARKQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGRTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKQFGRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.70%

4.04%

+8.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.15%

9.65%

+16.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.54%

12.42%

+21.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.50%

16.77%

+15.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.98%

18.14%

+11.84%

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FGRTX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKQ vs. FGRTX - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than FGRTX's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
3.59%3.89%2.68%2.06%4.38%4.79%7.96%12.98%21.72%15.57%1.97%4.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKQ and FGRTX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (12.70%) compared to FGRTX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs FGRTX's -56.17%.

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKQ and FGRTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer