ARKQ vs. EPU
ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. ARKQ is actively managed, while EPU is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ returned 22.08%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for EPU. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKQ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EPU.
Performance
ARKQ vs. EPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 22.98% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKQ has outperformed EPU with an annualized return of 22.08%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively lower 15.10% annualized return.
ARKQ
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 17.47%
- 6M
- 19.36%
- 1Y
- 64.14%
- 3Y*
- 34.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.08%
EPU
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 22.98%
- 6M
- 29.01%
- 1Y
- 88.50%
- 3Y*
- 46.17%
- 5Y*
- 30.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
ARKQ vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 17.47% | 48.81% | 33.88% | 40.70% | -46.75% | 1.74% | 107.20% | 25.94% | -7.89% | 52.26% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 22.98% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKQ and EPU is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.44 |
The correlation between ARKQ and EPU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKQ vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKQ
EPU
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
-
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
ARKQ
EPU
Technology
ARKQ
EPU
-
Consumer Cyclical
ARKQ
EPU
Communication Services
ARKQ
EPU
Energy
ARKQ
EPU
-
Healthcare
ARKQ
EPU
Utilities
ARKQ
EPU
Basic Materials
ARKQ
-
EPU
Consumer Defensive
ARKQ
-
EPU
Financial Services
ARKQ
-
EPU
Real Estate
ARKQ
-
EPU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKQ vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank
ARKQ
EPU
ARKQ vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKQ | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 4.27 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 12.29 | -3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKQ vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, roughly equal to the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and EPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKQ | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.89% | -60.62% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.58% | -20.85% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.76% | -20.85% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.71% | -35.59% | -20.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.89% | -50.97% | -8.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.35% | -5.18% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -18.81% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 7.22% | -0.24% |
Volatility
ARKQ vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) have volatilities of 13.37% and 13.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKQ | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 13.56% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.41% | 26.92% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.76% | 31.12% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 25.09% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 23.64% | +6.37% |
ARKQ vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKQ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKQ vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison
ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than EPU's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 2.97% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKQ and EPU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs EPU's -60.62%.
On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 15.10% for EPU. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.
EPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.
ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKQ and 0.59% for EPU.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKQ and EPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer