ARKQ vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ARKQ (ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKQ is a Robotics fund actively managed by ARK, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARKQ returned 32.57%/yr vs 48.02%/yr for CHAT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKQ achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 57.97% return.

ARKQ

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 12.86%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 55.23%
• 3Y*: 32.57%
• 5Y*: 9.89%
• 10Y*: 21.73%

CHAT

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: 57.97%
• 6M: 60.59%
• 1Y: 109.99%
• 3Y*: 48.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	12.86%	48.81%	33.88%	20.74%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	57.97%	49.85%	30.98%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKQ and CHAT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.74

The correlation between ARKQ and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ARKQ	CHAT
Industrials	40.2%	0.8%
Technology	33.1%	76.5%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	5.6%
Communication Services	8.7%	16.6%
Energy	1.6%	-
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

ARKQ vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKQ

ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 92
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKQ	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	3.34	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	3.60	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.50	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	6.79	-4.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.95	19.03	-11.08

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKQ and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKQ drawdown since its inception was -59.89%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKQ and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKQ	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.89%	-31.34%	-28.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.58%	-16.28%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.76%	-31.34%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.02%	-9.97%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.22%	-5.39%	-11.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.97%	5.80%	+1.17%

Volatility

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) is 12.70%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that ARKQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKQ	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.70%	16.40%	-3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.15%	28.00%	-1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.54%	33.14%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.50%	30.65%	+1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.98%	30.65%	-0.67%

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ARKQ and CHAT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ARKQ vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than CHAT's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF	0.24%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.80%	0.86%	0.00%	2.86%	1.54%	0.00%	0.98%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.80%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKQ and CHAT in my portfolio?

ARKQ and CHAT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKQ or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to ARKQ (12.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKQ dropped -59.89% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, ARKQ or CHAT?

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 48.02% vs 32.57% for ARKQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 12.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKQ or CHAT?

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 48.02% return vs 32.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKQ or CHAT?

ARKQ and CHAT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKQ or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.24% for ARKQ.

What is the main difference between ARKQ and CHAT?

ARKQ is categorized as Robotics, while CHAT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.