ARKK vs. ANGL
ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) and ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK, while ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. ARKK is actively managed, while ANGL is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ARKK returned 15.39%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for ANGL. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARKK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ANGL.
Performance
ARKK vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKK achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ARKK has outperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 15.39%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.13% annualized return.
ARKK
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -7.42%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- -7.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
ANGL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
ARKK vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | -1.35% | 35.49% | 8.40% | 69.04% | -66.97% | -23.60% | 152.71% | 35.08% | 3.52% | 87.33% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.27% | 9.04% | 6.06% | 12.52% | -14.26% | 6.84% | 13.20% | 18.06% | -5.84% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKK and ANGL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2014 | 0.50 |
The correlation between ARKK and ANGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
ARKK vs. ANGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARKK
ANGL
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
ARKK
ANGL
-
Technology
ARKK
ANGL
-
Financial Services
ARKK
ANGL
Consumer Cyclical
ARKK
ANGL
-
Communication Services
ARKK
ANGL
-
Industrials
ARKK
ANGL
-
Basic Materials
ARKK
-
ANGL
-
Consumer Defensive
ARKK
-
ANGL
-
Energy
ARKK
-
ANGL
-
Real Estate
ARKK
-
ANGL
-
Utilities
ARKK
-
ANGL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKK vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank
ARKK
ANGL
ARKK vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKK | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 1.93 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 8.09 | -6.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKK | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.81 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.43 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.66 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.73 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
ARKK vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKK drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKK and ANGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKK | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.97% | -29.31% | -51.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.35% | -4.05% | -27.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.56% | -5.48% | -34.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.23% | -19.25% | -57.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.97% | -29.31% | -51.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.87% | -0.58% | -50.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.14% | -3.30% | -26.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.18% | 0.96% | +13.22% |
Volatility
ARKK vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.35%. This indicates that ARKK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKK | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 1.35% | +9.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.96% | 3.50% | +22.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.15% | 4.34% | +31.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.38% | 7.63% | +38.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.34% | 9.28% | +31.06% |
ARKK vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKK vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
ARKK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.39% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKK and ANGL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKK has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to ANGL (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKK dropped -80.97% vs ANGL's -29.31%.
On 10-year performance, ARKK leads with 15.39% vs 6.13% for ANGL. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKK has performed better with a 15.39% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.
ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 0.00% for ARKK.
ARKK is categorized as Technology Equities, while ANGL is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ARK and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ARKK and 0.35% for ANGL.
ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKK and ANGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer