ARKF vs. ATEN
ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) is Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK, while ATEN (A10 Networks, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ARKF returned -4.19%/yr vs 27.49%/yr for ATEN. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ARKF vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARKF achieves a -16.17% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 78.64% return.
ARKF
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -7.12%
- YTD
- -16.17%
- 6M
- -20.39%
- 1Y
- -4.73%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- -4.19%
- 10Y*
- —
ATEN
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- 16.52%
- YTD
- 78.64%
- 6M
- 79.14%
- 1Y
- 78.86%
- 3Y*
- 30.27%
- 5Y*
- 27.49%
- 10Y*
- 17.58%
ARKF vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -16.17% | 28.67% | 34.34% | 93.27% | -65.07% | -17.82% | 108.03% | 19.04% |
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 78.64% | -2.59% | 42.08% | -19.43% | 1.70% | 68.66% | 43.52% | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKF and ATEN is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2019 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKF vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank
ARKF
ATEN
ARKF vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARKF | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.39 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 4.59 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 8.72 | -8.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARKF | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 | 2.47 | -2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.65 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.13 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
ARKF vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKF drawdown since its inception was -78.63%, roughly equal to the maximum ATEN drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKF and ATEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKF | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.63% | -78.29% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.50% | -17.26% | -21.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.50% | -32.14% | -6.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.30% | -43.87% | -31.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.16% | -3.68% | -33.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -40.27% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.22% | 9.07% | +11.15% |
Volatility
ARKF vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) is 8.36%, while A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that ARKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKF | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 9.20% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.47% | 24.65% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.66% | 32.10% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.79% | 42.35% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.77% | 43.10% | -3.33% |
Dividends
ARKF vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison
ARKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ATEN's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 0.76% | 1.36% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 1.26% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKF and ATEN have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATEN has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to ARKF (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKF dropped -78.63% vs ATEN's -78.29%.
ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARKF and ATEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer