PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKD vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKD vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARKD

1D
-1.06%
1M
0.28%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKD vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARKD and UGA is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKD vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKD vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKDUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

ARKD vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKD vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKDUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-86.59%

+72.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-18.05%

+12.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-36.69%

+30.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

Volatility

ARKD vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKDUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.51%

35.22%

-14.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

34.45%

-13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

37.22%

-16.71%

ARKD vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKD vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARKD nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ARKD and UGA have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.

ARKD and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ARKD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 0.75% for UGA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKD and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer