ARKD vs. RSPG
ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ARK, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. ARKD is actively managed, while RSPG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. ARKD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.
Performance
ARKD vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKD
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPG
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- 6M
- 23.53%
- YTD
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 32.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
ARKD vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.21% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKD and RSPG is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKD vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank
ARKD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPG
ARKD vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKD | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKD vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and RSPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKD | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -79.98% | +65.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -10.24% | +7.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -25.39% | +19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.31% | — |
Volatility
ARKD vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKD | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 21.90% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 28.12% | -7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 33.47% | -13.32% |
ARKD vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKD vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison
ARKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 2.08% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKD and RSPG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSPG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSPG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.
RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for ARKD.
ARKD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSPG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 0.40% for RSPG.
Find the right allocation for ARKD and RSPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer