PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARKD vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARKD vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARKD

1D
-1.31%
1M
1.36%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
2.31%
6M
2.35%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKD vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARKD and RBIL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARKD vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKD vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARKDRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.07

ARKD vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARKD vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARKDRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-0.52%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-0.51%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-0.07%

-5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.09%

Volatility

ARKD vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARKDRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.54%

0.95%

+19.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.54%

1.07%

+19.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

1.07%

+19.47%

ARKD vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARKD vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ARKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ARKD and RBIL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.00% for ARKD.

ARKD is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ARK and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 0.17% for RBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARKD and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer