ARKD vs. EZET
ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ARKD is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARKD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.
Performance
ARKD vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARKD
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- 6M
- -41.69%
- YTD
- -39.70%
- 1Y
- -40.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKD vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.21% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -39.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARKD and EZET is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARKD vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
ARKD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZET
ARKD vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARKD | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.95 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARKD vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARKD drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKD and EZET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARKD | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -67.89% | +53.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -67.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -63.04% | +59.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -34.41% | +28.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 42.85% | — |
Volatility
ARKD vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARKD | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.15% | 68.50% | -48.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 72.03% | -51.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 72.03% | -51.88% |
ARKD vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARKD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARKD vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
Neither ARKD nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ARKD and EZET have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.
ARKD and EZET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: ARK and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for ARKD and 0.19% for EZET.
Find the right allocation for ARKD and EZET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer