ARKB vs. CAOS

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARKB is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. ARKB is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Over the past year, ARKB returned -44.32% vs 2.02% for CAOS. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. ARKB charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.

Performance

ARKB vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARKB achieves a -25.79% return, which is significantly lower than CAOS's 0.84% return.

ARKB

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: -33.61%
• YTD: -25.79%
• 1Y: -44.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CAOS

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: 0.30%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 1Y: 2.02%
• 3Y*: 3.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARKB vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF	-25.79%	-6.59%	86.54%
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.84%	2.55%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ARKB and CAOS is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	-0.18

Return for Risk

ARKB vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARKB

ARKB Risk / Return Rank: 2
ARKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ARKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ARKB Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ARKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ARKB Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 53
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARKB vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARKB	CAOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	1.31	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.49	2.09	-3.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.27	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	2.68	-3.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	6.06	-7.40

ARKB vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARKB Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARKB and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARKB vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARKB drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARKB and CAOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARKB	CAOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.33%	-3.89%	-49.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.33%	-0.76%	-52.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.32%	-1.04%	-47.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.69%	-0.92%	-16.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.96%	0.33%	+32.63%

Volatility

ARKB vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) has a higher volatility of 11.73% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.48%. This indicates that ARKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARKB	CAOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.73%	0.48%	+11.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.86%	1.09%	+33.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.29%	1.56%	+42.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.78%	4.20%	+45.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.78%	4.20%	+45.58%

ARKB vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARKB has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARKB vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARKB nor CAOS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARKB and CAOS in my portfolio?

ARKB and CAOS have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARKB or CAOS?

ARKB has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to CAOS (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARKB dropped -53.33% vs CAOS's -3.89%.

Which ETF is better, ARKB or CAOS?

On 1-year performance, CAOS leads with 2.02% vs -44.32% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARKB or CAOS?

Over the 1-year period, CAOS has performed better with a 2.02% return vs -44.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARKB or CAOS?

ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARKB or CAOS?

ARKB and CAOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ARKB and CAOS?

ARKB is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ARKB and 0.63% for CAOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.