PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARIIX vs. PRRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II (ARIIX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARIIX achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than PRRSX's 11.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ARIIX has underperformed PRRSX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while PRRSX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.52% annualized return.


ARIIX

1D
-1.93%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.48%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
4.85%

PRRSX

1D
-1.99%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
11.65%
6M
9.82%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
6.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARIIX
AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II
5.48%10.49%2.89%12.50%-25.35%26.57%-4.62%23.44%-4.31%14.43%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
11.65%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ARIIX and PRRSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.87

The correlation between ARIIX and PRRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARIIX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARIIX
ARIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ARIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ARIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II (ARIIX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ARIIXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

1.06

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.49

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.83

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.67

6.33

-2.67

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the PRRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARIIX and PRRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARIIXPRRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.06

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.17

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.30

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.35

-0.01

Drawdowns

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARIIX drawdown since its inception was -70.35%, smaller than the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARIIX and PRRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARIIXPRRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.35%

-77.82%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-9.05%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

-17.77%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-37.14%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.30%

-45.75%

+3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-3.65%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.78%

-13.09%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.61%

+0.27%

Volatility

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II (ARIIX) is 3.67%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that ARIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARIIXPRRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.28%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

10.18%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.89%

14.28%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

20.21%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

21.87%

-4.24%

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARIIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARIIX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison

ARIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARIIX
AB Global Real Estate Investment Fund II
3.49%3.77%2.99%3.34%5.98%4.38%1.54%8.58%4.72%5.59%5.20%3.45%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ARIIX and PRRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to ARIIX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARIIX dropped -70.35% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARIIX and PRRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer