ARI vs. BILS
ARI (Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc.) is a stock, while BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 5 years, ARI returned 3.94%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for BILS. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ARI vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARI achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 1.40% return.
ARI
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
BILS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
ARI vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARI Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. | 15.23% | 23.83% | -16.51% | 24.46% | -7.12% | 29.66% | 36.88% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.40% | 4.23% | 5.17% | 4.92% | 0.90% | -0.08% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARI and BILS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARI vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
ARI
BILS
ARI vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -99.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 42.08 | -40.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 129.91 | -127.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 1,442.41 | -1,437.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 16.80 | -15.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 10.79 | -10.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 9.79 | -9.58 |
Drawdowns
ARI vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARI drawdown since its inception was -77.39%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARI and BILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.39% | -0.41% | -76.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.04% | -0.03% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.73% | -0.04% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -0.38% | -41.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -0.01% | -2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -0.04% | -8.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 0.00% | +4.44% |
Volatility
ARI vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. (ARI) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) at 0.06%. This indicates that ARI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARI | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 0.06% | +3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 0.14% | +13.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 0.23% | +18.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.79% | 0.31% | +30.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.99% | 0.30% | +43.69% |
Dividends
ARI vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
ARI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.18%, more than BILS's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARI Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc. | 9.18% | 10.33% | 13.86% | 11.93% | 13.01% | 10.64% | 12.98% | 10.06% | 11.04% | 9.97% | 11.07% | 10.33% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARI and BILS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARI has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to BILS (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARI dropped -77.39% vs BILS's -0.41%.
BILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.80 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARI and BILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer