ARGT vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
ARGT and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ARGT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Argentina 25/50. It was launched on Mar 2, 2011. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both ARGT and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ARGT vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ARGT vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 2.09% | 11.51% | 63.46% | 53.64% | 11.80% | 3.83% | 14.58% | 14.50% | -15.84% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 8.57% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARGT achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.
ARGT
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- 34.80%
- 1Y
- 16.52%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 28.13%
- 10Y*
- 18.46%
GLDM
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- 1Y
- 49.77%
- 3Y*
- 33.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ARGT vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARGT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ARGT vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
ARGT
GLDM
ARGT vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARGT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.82 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 2.25 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.33 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 2.71 | -2.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 10.04 | -8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARGT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.82 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.25 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.09 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between ARGT and GLDM is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ARGT vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
ARGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 0.83% | 0.84% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.45% | 0.93% | 0.28% | 1.21% | 1.34% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 0.89% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ARGT vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARGT drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARGT and GLDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARGT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -21.63% | -40.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.46% | -19.14% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.14% | -20.92% | -14.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.35% | -13.19% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -6.04% | -16.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.33% | 5.16% | +7.17% |
Volatility
ARGT vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) is 9.70%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that ARGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ARGT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.70% | 11.01% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.27% | 24.07% | +4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.23% | 27.57% | +11.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.77% | 17.65% | +14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.37% | 16.77% | +14.60% |