ARFFX vs. GTTMX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ARFFX (Ariel Focus Fund) and GTTMX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ARFFX returned 10.56%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for GTTMX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ARFFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for GTTMX.

Performance

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ARFFX having a 14.83% return and GTTMX slightly lower at 14.70%. Over the past 10 years, ARFFX has underperformed GTTMX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while GTTMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.

ARFFX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 3.52%
• 6M: 6.39%
• YTD: 14.83%
• 1Y: 29.60%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 9.13%
• 10Y*: 10.56%
• ALL TIME*: 7.38%

GTTMX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 3.95%
• 6M: 9.79%
• YTD: 14.70%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: 12.46%
• ALL TIME*: 8.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARFFX Ariel Focus Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ARFFX Ariel Focus Fund	14.83%	21.00%	13.39%	6.98%	-9.12%	21.14%	6.90%	25.62%	-13.23%	15.01%
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	14.70%	18.40%	14.84%	9.39%	-13.90%	41.28%	5.12%	24.18%	-11.99%	22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ARFFX and GTTMX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between ARFFX and GTTMX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ARFFX vs. GTTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ARFFX

ARFFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
ARFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ARFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ARFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ARFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ARFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

GTTMX

GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 78
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARFFX	GTTMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.78	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	2.47	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.30	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	4.17	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.75	13.75	-5.01

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GTTMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARFFX and GTTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARFFX drawdown since its inception was -57.66%, roughly equal to the maximum GTTMX drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARFFX and GTTMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARFFX	GTTMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.66%	-56.24%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.02%	-6.51%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-20.62%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.50%	-24.12%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	-44.59%	+1.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-0.05%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-10.17%	+0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	1.97%	+1.29%

Volatility

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Volatility Comparison

Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) at 3.30%. This indicates that ARFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTTMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARFFX	GTTMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	3.30%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	11.45%	-2.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	15.22%	-1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	18.28%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.79%	20.48%	-0.69%

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARFFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTMX's 1.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARFFX vs. GTTMX - Dividend Comparison

ARFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, less than GTTMX's 16.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ARFFX Ariel Focus Fund	11.04%	12.68%	2.27%	3.33%	8.30%	3.30%	2.41%	1.03%	7.61%	5.76%	1.04%	13.91%
GTTMX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio	16.47%	18.85%	14.45%	5.83%	0.40%	17.50%	11.58%	5.95%	9.88%	3.00%	0.55%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARFFX and GTTMX in my portfolio?

ARFFX and GTTMX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARFFX or GTTMX?

ARFFX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to GTTMX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARFFX dropped -57.66% vs GTTMX's -56.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ARFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.